Either to exclude things like a tree or the neighbors driveway. I haven't tried the mobile app.Īllot of my false alarms could be fixed with boundary boxes. The remote web view while nice doesn't show the boundary boxes on the objects / people like the software does which would have been nice otherwise its fine. The entire reason to use it over other motion detecting is to find the people and not sift though hundreds of random movement, but if you have to look though all the object detection to find the rest of the people it defeats the purpose. Now this might have something to do with my high cameras and the angle I dont know. So if your just monitoring the people detection it seems that its not actually going to catch all or even most of the people. The other two were detected as just 'objects' - the same objects that have hundreds of false positives from stuff moving in the wind. And of these 3 tests it only detected one of the three has a 'person'. The worst thing is not the false 'people' positives but that I tested all 3 cameras by walking in their path. 3 being tree movement and 3 were the neighbors car. Out of the 7 'people' detected, 6 were false alarms.

Most of the object detections were just tree/bush movement from the wind or at night light reflected from someone driving past (street nowhere near camera). From one day it made 230 clips from object and person detection. The 'person' (not object) detection has had a few false alarms. The detection isn't working nearly as well as they make it seem.įirst is the false alarms.

The remote web access is really clean and simple as well. Probably the most simple one I've ever used - a little too simple for my taste but really good for non computer tech to use. I've been testing it with my cameras, the app is really simple to use.

Sighthound software zmodo